This is new to me, so I did a quick search for a few examples of such documents.

The very first result was a 404

https://aws.amazon.com/compliance/reports/

The jokes write themselves.

staticassertion 2 hours ago | parent [-]

But how is this related to the internet being archivable? This sort of proves the point that URLs were always a terrible idea to reference in your compliance docs, the answer was always to get the actual docs.

▲

paulryanrogers an hour ago | parent | next [-]

IME compliance tools will take a doc and or a link. What's acceptable is up to the auditor. IMO both a link and doc are best.

Links alone can be tempting as you've to reference the same docs or policies over and over for various controls.

▲

aussieguy1234 an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Wayback machine URLs are much more likely to be stable.

Even if the content is taken down, changed or moved, a copy is likely to still be available in the Wayback Machine.

	▲	staticassertion 21 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I would never rely on this vs just downloading the SOC2 reports, which almost always aren't public anyways and need to be requested explicitly. I suspect that that compliance page would have just linked to a bunch of PDF downloads or possibly even a "request a zip file from us after you sign an NDA" anyways.