| ▲ | pwarner 3 hours ago |
| > Microsoft did, and Teams is by all reports a solid success. Not sure if the author has used Teams. But otherwise, I agree we need an actual good, adorable Slack clone. I thought Google might do this after not buying Slack, but I'm not hearing anything about their solution. |
|
| ▲ | simfree 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Teams is shovelware. Force bundled, with questionably reliable messaging, okay video calling (if your organization policies don't break it), and a fairly useless Phone System component that misbehaves often. Great for organizations that believe these forms of communication should be an afterthought that has rough edges and inconsistent reliability. The recent changes to end webhook support, kill Linux desktop support and do yet another rewrite are inane. Don't expect features you use today in Teams to work in 2 years... |
| |
| ▲ | icameron 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | My org went all in on Teams over 6 years ago. Removed all PBX systems and desk phones. Pulled out Cisco phones from 20 offices. Ported all numbers to MS. By all accounts it was unremarkable to the end users, and when WFH mandates started it was seamless. Definitely a lot less IT support for configuring and troubleshooting a phone system too. There is far less downtime because Teams will ring through to your cell phone if the office internet is down or your laptop is off. That was not possible when the Cisco routers and CallManager in the office were running the DIDs and local extensions | | |
| ▲ | viraptor 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > That was not possible when the Cisco routers and CallManager in the office were running the DIDs and local extensions You could do it with other software hosted outside the office though. There are definitely options here. | |
| ▲ | phatfish 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The hot takes are from people that have haven't touched Teams in 6 years. Like everything Microsoft it was shit for the first few years, they slowly sorted it out, and now it's fine. Most non-tech-bro businesses successfully run the majority of their comms through it. The main problem now is that it works fine, and the project managers on Teams need to create work for themselves, so just mess around with stuff that wasn't broken. | | |
| ▲ | folmar an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | > The main problem now is that it works fine Except from: * notifications for channels * search * using more than one org (needs app restart!) although
screen sharing between 'classic' and 'web' editions works only if sender's and receiver's graphic cards share a hw-accelerated video format blessed by teams. Not, it's not easy to check what edition you are running and you can't change it without poking js variables by hand * inconsistent read statuses between devices * 'incoming call not shown at all' bug (but you get a missed call notification) * can't join two video calls even in two separate windows * random audio device switching on every morning (even if you don't close the app and computer for the night) | |
| ▲ | smallmancontrov an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It's fine. Messages sometimes fail to appear unless you navigate away and back and sometimes they fail to appear at all until 30 minutes later but it's fine. This regularly slows down communication and costs company time, but it's fine. It's 2026, classrooms full of children can vibe code a chat app but a $3T company struggles with basic chat functionality. It's fine. | |
| ▲ | bsaul 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | still no way to check your email from teams though. | | |
| ▲ | fassssst an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Why would you want to do that? Outlook is perfectly fine, and on Windows it’s easy enough to toggle between the two windows. | |
| ▲ | idiotsecant an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | There's no way to check my tire pressure through teams, either. That's a good thing. Let applications do a thing. The more we duplicate the crappier the original and the duplicate get. |
|
| |
| ▲ | stonogo 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It was, in fact, even with existing Microsoft products (Lync/Skype for Business). It was even possible if you had paid for those features for UCM from Cisco. Teams was simply the cheaper option (although they tried to keep charging my org Lync prices, and we had to threaten to uproot MS products and go to Cisco before they gave us the new pricing). |
| |
| ▲ | pwarner 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > Great for organizations that believe these forms of communication should be an afterthought Yeah great for in person and email companies. |
|
|
| ▲ | miki123211 4 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Teams is definitely a solid success. It is by no means a good app. Those two things aren't the same. Slack started with an aggressive "bottom up" approach, they made something actually good and got to worrying about the sales part later. You don't need sales as much when companies come to you, begging you for an actual contract that fulfills their enterprise requirements, knowing that rooting you out is almost impossible. Teams went the other way, in typical Microsoft style. Microsoft sells it bundled with all the other Microsoft things it sells. Most companies want a Microsoft contract anyway, and have an established sales relationship with MS, so adopting Teams is a lot less compliance, integration and procurement work than adopting anything else. You don't need good UI if your sales strategy isn't predicated on users choosing you for UI. And then there's Discord, which really isn't a bad work comms app if you're small enough not to need the compliance stuff. It gives you almost everything the big apps do for free, including unlimited calls, an advanced RBAC system, as many channels / messages as you want, a decent bot API (including media streaming), good notification management, multi-server / cross-organization support etc. They're actively disinterested in selling to businesses (which is what makes them so good, the features they paywall are the features needed by gamers, not serious professionals), but that also means you'll need to eventually migrate off of it when compliance requirements set in. |
|
| ▲ | darth_avocado 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| We are being forced to dump slack for Teams. The only people who like Teams is Sales and Marketing for some reason. Not a single engineer likes this, and it will break every engineering convenience that exists on Slack. |
| |
| ▲ | awesome_dude 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | As an ENG - I REALLY dislike teams - but I also dislike Slack Slack should be emails that have been arranged into different folders - it just doesn't vibe with me for much otherwise (oo look you have 200 channels on unread - or, if you are the reverse, ooo look 200 channels with people chatting and I have to check every single one of them :( |
|
|
| ▲ | dgxyz an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Sod it all. Just give me a decent email client again. Business instant messaging is electric shoulder tapping and that makes me want to punch people. I literally feel Slack drains me every day. |
|
| ▲ | Muromec 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I use teams at work and it's okay. Not the best, not the worst, but okay piece of software. At least I have both the calendar and the videocall things in one app and see when the call starts, so I don't accidentally ADHD myself into missing it. |
| |
| ▲ | viraptor 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Anything that accepts webhook integrations will be able to do this. I've got the Google calendar and meeting notifications on Slack, but it would be trivial to replicate with any two systems that have APIs available. | | |
| ▲ | PretzelPirate 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | My company would never let me expose my calendar data to Slack. That's why they like M365, all the integration is there with less risk of oversharing data. | | |
| |
| ▲ | simfree 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Exactly, no on is truly overjoyed with Teams. As shovelware goes it is passable, but that is a low bar |
|
|
| ▲ | steeleduncan 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Discord if you don't mind something proprietary, Mattermost or Rocketchat if you do, Zulip if you want something slightly different . . . and no doubt many other alternatives Slack is easy to replace with something cheaper and better on a product or technical level. The network effects are strong of course, but they won't sustain it forever |
| |
| ▲ | glerk 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Discord is a solid product. They just need to launch a simple business-friendly alternative UI without the teenager gamer aesthetics. I’m surprised they never tried going after the enterprise market. |
|
|
| ▲ | cj 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > I thought Google might do this after not buying Slack They did: Google Chat. It’s bundled with Google Workspace. |
| |
| ▲ | figmert 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | And it's worse than Teams | | |
| ▲ | bigstrat2003 34 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | In no way is Gchat worse than teams. It's basic, but the basic functionality works... which is a lot more than you can say for teams. | |
| ▲ | cj 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I used it for about a year with a small team. It worked well for what it does, but the functionality is definitely stripped down and barebones compared to Slack. I don't remember any performance or reliability issues. | |
| ▲ | 2muchcoffeeman 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It’s fine if you want a barebones chat. | | |
|
|
|
| ▲ | MagicMoonlight 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| What issues do you have with teams? It works well and there’s nothing I can think of that I want in it. It’s just a video and chat app. |
| |
| ▲ | vladvasiliu 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It's by and large the slowest, jankiest, laggiest software I use regularly. And I say that as someone who swears Adobe has added a bunch of sleeps in Lightroom. On basic chat: it will sometimes scroll up when I get a new message, while I'm actively participating in that chat, so I need to scroll back down to read the new messages. Occasionally it flickers, for bonus points. It will not mark the chat as read if I'm on it without clicking on a different chat and coming back. It's the only software I use that, for some reason, has an effect on my typing accuracy. Don't even get me started on its handling of copy/paste. I'm also pretty sure there's some joke I just don't get around the search function. For calls: it refuses to pick the correct microphone, and will sometimes mute it completely somehow (I lose the feedback in the headphones – I have a jabra headset that does this). This will even happen when I hang up a call and start another one right away. Other times it works well. My default mic is always my wired, always connected, headset mic. I don't use BT headsets that switch from music to communications or whatever depending on what I do, which could confuse the available / selected mics. It drains my laptop's and iphone's battery like no tomorrow, even if I turn off video and only do voice chat, even if nobody has the camera on or shares a screen. Also, on Windows, for some reason it doesn't use the native notifications, but implements its own crappy ones – but this isn't that big of an issue, since I mostly disable them anyway. All this is happening on both the "heavy" (heh) Windows client, and on chrome on Linux, both running on a fairly beefy new PC with gobs of RAM. Fun fact: the experience was exactly the same on my 5-year-old laptop with a U-series Intel CPU, so I don't think it's a resources problem. | | |
| ▲ | folmar an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | > It drains my laptop's and iphone's battery like no tomorrow Use Teams in Firefox with ublock for battery issues, somehow it consumes much less. > It's the only software I use that, for some reason, has an effect on my typing accuracy. That's because the typed letters appear with a large (often even ~1 s) delay. Close your eyes while typing and you'll be back on you track. | |
| ▲ | jiggawatts 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Teams developers are like that obese guy in the seat next to you on the airplane, just… spreading out into your personal space. For example, Teams likes to control system-wide audio settings instead of acting like any other application. I had to disable the “allow applications to have dedicated hardware access” feature in my sound card driver to stop it screwing around with my settings. I’ve never had to do this for any other app. It also likes to “edit” system controls like right-click menus on the task bar. This not only breaks muscle memory, but they also put in a gap so that if you move the mouse onto the menu… it closes. | | |
| ▲ | smelendez 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I have this problem with Microsoft software in general lately. Last time I had the Office suite installed on a Mac, it was constantly popping up focus-stealing (literally and figuratively) notifications that it was updating PowerPoint or whatever, even when I didn’t have any Microsoft apps open. I really try to stick to the web-based Office suite and Apple Pages/Numbers/etc. to avoid dealing with this. |
|
| |
| ▲ | udfalkso 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Teams suffers from one giant problem. There is a totally odd, but understandable from tech debt perspective, segregation between “chats” and “teams” which makes it practically impossible to find everything. It’s a fatal flaw. Slack is beautifully simple and effective in comparison. Also, the reminder feature on slack is extremely useful to me personally and I miss it dearly in teams. | |
| ▲ | misir 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Let me clear my cache after logging in twice to get the OOM fixed so I can finally login to show you what’s wrong with it over a teams call and hope it doesn’t logout and reload randomly during the call. | |
| ▲ | pwarner 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | The fundamental design choice of Teams teams channels makes channels unusable vs Slack channels.
The chat part (outside channels) is OK. I've seen the metrics for our instance (10k users), the teams channel part is basically unused. Does this matter?
Yes, I think so for a chat first culture. |
|
|
| ▲ | spprashant 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Its a solid success if you squint just at the adoption numbers they achieved by cross selling it. |
|
| ▲ | tootie 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I guess I'm in the minority but I haven't noticed a significant variance in quality and features on any chat app I've used in the past 20 years. It seems like a thoroughly solved problem. Slack's "killer feature" was that they really streamlined onboarding which is feels neat the first time you do it. Otherwise, chat is chat. The biggest obstacle has always been getting everyone you need to talk to to agree on which platform to use. |
|
| ▲ | MattGaiser 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Yeah, I would be curious if there is anyone out there paying for Teams. Teams wins as Teams is free with your other Office stuff. |
|
| ▲ | e12e 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Google gave us Wave - surely that's enough? /s |