| ▲ | marginalia_nu 3 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tangentially related, I have a hunch, but cannot prove, that prediction markets are the driving force behind a lot of the bad information online, since they essentially monetarily incentivize making people misjudge the state of the world. There's been a huge uptick in this sort of brigade like behavior around current events. First noted it around LK99, that failed room temperature semiconductor in 2023, but it just keeps happening. Used to be we only saw it around elections and crypto pump and dumps, now it's cropping up in the weirdest places. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | 3eb7988a1663 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
That seems really high effort. I assume most events are things which are hard to influence, so at best you are hoping to tilt the wager odds into your favor. Which could backfire if you are betting on the wrong outcome. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | digiown 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interesting theory. I'm inclined to disagree, however. Prediction markets essentially allows people to trade information for money, even the types historically more difficult to trade. There aren't enough people betting on things for deliberate misinformation to become worthwhile, IMO, and most people would stop betting after being in the wrong too often, unlike casinos which always let you win sometimes. I believe the misinformation is largely by self-interested parties. Politicians as well as influencers trying to push agendas, and the engagement/attention farming for advertising revenue, which are largely indifferent to truth. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||