| ▲ | era86 5 hours ago |
| tmux + vim + Claude Code |
|
| ▲ | bicx 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| This. With so much of my work being done with Claude Code via terminal, I’ve used vim and tmux more than I have in the 20 years since I was first introduced. |
| |
| ▲ | linhns 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | How many people don’t know tmux in the industry is really beyond me. | | |
| ▲ | tommy_axle 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | With all the buzz about orchestrating in the age of CLI agents there doesn't seem to be much talk about vim + tmux with send-keys (a blessing). You can run as many windows and panes doing so many different things across multiple projects. | |
| ▲ | jimmaswell 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | What's the elevator pitch if I already know Screen and I can just open multiple windows of the terminal emulator? | | |
| ▲ | mystifyingpoi 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | No pitch - just use screen, most people use tmux in exactly the same way - open a few splits and switch between them with keyboard shortcuts. | |
| ▲ | hibbelig 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I switched from screen to tmux due to rumor about the screen code base. Maybe not a good reason. But I don’t regret it, tmux works well. Just an honest opinion of someone who didn’t have skin in the game. Not sure if it helps. |
|
| |
| ▲ | Keyframe 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | same, although I'm using zellij instead of tmux. Copilot works well in vim too. |
|
|
| ▲ | sorentwo 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Nearly this, but using ghostty instead of tmux. You don’t get the remote connection aspect of tmux, but for splitting/zooming/preserving windows it is fantastic. The best part is you can configure natural shortcuts rather than using a leader for everything. |
| |
| ▲ | dotancohen 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | As a tmux user, sell me on ghostty. I hate the leader key, especially in VIM. |
|