I'm also trying to understand. The agenda is to publish about Trump and Elon? Is that correct?

The agenda is to highlight when Trump and Elon blunder but ignore neutral or positive stories. Go to the front page right now and look at the articles, I see four mentioning Trump that are negatively charged. That isn't to say any one article is untrue, but hard to miss the curated pattern

▲

bsimpson 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Honest question: has he done anything you think warrants good press?

I too quickly grew tired of the constant doomerism in his first term, but this one seems to be unmitigatedly terrible.

	▲	cubefox 27 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Apart from articles by the two space reporters, any news about Musk tend to be biased towards being extremely negative.