> That's your human brain thinking it knows better. The "bitter lesson" of AI is that more data=better performance and even if you try to build a system that encapsulates human-brain common sense, it will be trounced by a system simply trained on more data.

I feel you glossed over what I was saying.

Let me try to rephrase: if we ever get to a future where humans are not needed to look at or maintain code again, all the training data would be LLM generated.

In that case, the ideal language for representing logic in programming is still going to be a Lisp-like one.