> I'm not an AI "advocate". I'm telling y'all about how the world is. How it's going to be.

This, together with grand claims that obviously don't hold up in reality, does make you an AI advocate no matter how much you dislike the label.

If you comment was more measured and had nuanced view, then I'd understand wanting to push back on it. But then you also say stuff like "Even a legacy code base can be poured into an LLM, which will grok it instantly" so no wonder others see you as a AI advocate.