| ▲ | oxonia 10 hours ago |
| Too long an article (about type!) to be in white monospace text on a black background. |
|
| ▲ | olivia-banks 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I had to use a reader view extension to stand it ;-) |
| |
| ▲ | layer8 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Safari Reader View doesn’t support the site, so I backed out. Too monospaced; didn’t read. |
|
|
| ▲ | brendamn 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Hiding the scrollbar is the real crime here. |
|
| ▲ | bob1029 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It's the border that hurts my visual cortex. |
|
| ▲ | NooneAtAll3 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| explain? |
| |
| ▲ | DavidPiper 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Not OP, but white text on black (especially at 100% contrast) is harder to read than black text on white. Monospace is harder to read than natural-width text. Large passages of text with both features is fatiguing to read. | | |
| ▲ | necovek an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Black text on white background with no backlight is easier to read. Think black text on paper. When it comes to computer screens, usually set too bright to accommodate varying ambient lightning conditions throughout the day/year, it's not as simple, and I am not sure there is a study to confirm it. And even if so, any individual's case might be different. | |
| ▲ | NooneAtAll3 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > white text on black is harder to read than black text on white not my experience (I prefer not to be flashbanged), but sure | | |
|
|
