| ▲ | jjmarr 10 hours ago |
| If you want to live with no electricity, no running water, and a lack of refrigerated food, you could do so purely on welfare. In that sense, we already have the UBI that Marx predicted. However, most people want fruits and vegetables instead of getting rickets, goiter, and cholera from an 1800s diet. Many are even willing to work 80+ hours a week to do so. |
|
| ▲ | 9dev 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Most non-banana republics across the world define the Minimum standard of living as having all of the things you listed, meaning welfare/social safety nets provide for that. As they should. We’re not animals. |
| |
| ▲ | sparky_z 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Correct. Of course, that wasn't the case in 1750 or 1900. It wouldn't have been possible then. Hence why prior technological changes that increased productivity didn't result in living lives of extended leisure, despite some predictions to that effect. Instead people kept working to raise the overall standard of living to what could be achieved when using the new tools to their fullest extent. Doing more, not doing the same with less effort. As you say, we're not animals. We can strive for better. | |
| ▲ | cortesoft 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I think that is part of the point, though. As our productivity increases, we don’t see an increase in leisure, instead we see an increase in what we consider the minimum standard of living. | |
| ▲ | hirvi74 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I appreciate that Finland considers Internet access of a minimum of 1 Mb to be a basic human right. I am not sure if other countries follow, but I wish the USA did. | | |
| ▲ | drnick1 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | It's laughably slow given how bloated the modern Web is. In fact even 10Mbps is barely enough to stream 1080p content. | | |
| ▲ | derektank 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | You’re not entirely wrong about bloat on modern websites, but if you griped about being unable to stream 1080p video to someone even just 15 years ago you would sound absurdly privileged |
|
| |
| ▲ | globalnode 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | So I can keep track of your wonderful comment, I'd like to add that looking up "banana republic", I realised Australia seems to fit that description perfectly! The latest crop they've come up with seems to be housing, but instead of fruit companies we have real estate cabals. With respect to the workers at the bottom of a banana republic, whats missing is the element of real choice. They say yes you can choose to not work harder but then you die early or suffer from disease, not much of a choice. Modern slavery is built on this idea of false choice. |
|
|
| ▲ | stouset 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I’m not really sure the point you’re trying to make behind “as long as you don’t mind dying early and painfully from easily preventable diseases technically you can live in utopia”. Would you mind clarifying your position here? |
| |
