| ▲ | kristopolous 3 hours ago | |||||||||||||
they probably also acknowledge pytorch, numpy, R ... but we don't attribute those tools as the agent who did the work. I know we've been primed by sci-fi movies and comic books, but like pytorch, gpt-5.2 is just a piece of software running on a computer instrumented by humans. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | famouswaffles 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
I don't see the authors of those libraries getting a credit on the paper, do you ? >I know we've been primed by sci-fi movies and comic books, but like pytorch, gpt-5.2 is just a piece of software running on a computer instrumented by humans. Sure | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | name_taken_duh 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
And we are just a system running on carbon-based biology in our physics computer run by whomever. What makes us special, to say that we are different than GPT-5.2? | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||