Applying for the bounty to deliver flowers and then simply not doing it seems like bad faith on the author's part in order to write that headline

▲

Volundr 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

If a job you apply for a job and it turns out it's not what it's advertised to be, there's nothing unethical in declining the job. The fact that the platform doesn't have a way of saying "nevermind thanks, not what I signed up for" is not the authors fault.

They were explicitly looking to do work for an AI, when it turned out to be a human driven marketing stunt they declined.

	▲	Dylan16807 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		They didn't decline because the idea "came from a brainstorm" with a human, that message was much later. They declined because the note on the flowers had a from line that was an AI startup. When you were otherwise on board with an unsolicited flower delivery and a social media post to make the sender look good, that's a picky reason to deny it, and saying it's "not what they signed up for" is a pretty big exaggeration. Except they didn't decline, they ghosted, and that's just bad behavior.

▲

add-sub-mul-div 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The entire site is bad faith to start with, it's human-assigned tasks with a veneer of autonomy to appeal to stupid investors and futurists.

Between the crypto and vibe coding the author had no reason to believe they'd actually get paid correctly if they did complete a task.

	▲	mewse-hn 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Experimentation is a lot easier when you've already decided the outcome

▲

renato_shira 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]