| ▲ | hypeatei a day ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Out of interest, how is that relevant? Are we not able to criticize a FOSS maintainers response unless we run a project of scale ourselves? The maintainer is clearly engaging and knows what the problem is but stalls on the "last mile" which is issue creation. Do you agree? wolfSSL also sells commercial licenses so it's not like they're going uncompensated for their work. Regardless, we shouldn't put people on pedestals because their title is "FOSS maintainer" | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | phoronixrly 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unless you're paying you are not entitled to anything apart from forking and fixing it yourself. You are especially not entitled to bullying maintainers as has been unfortunately the standard in infosec. Open source is not about you. https://gist.github.com/richhickey/1563cddea1002958f96e7ba95... IMO more projects have to explicitly state this for example in a terms document, like https://github.com/mhoye/maintenance-terms/blob/main/MAINTEN... | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | deng a day ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[flagged] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||