I guess this is just a riff of marcus aurelius flavour stoicism

but ask yourself with regard to every present difficulty: 'What is there in this that is unbearable and beyond endurance?' You would be ashamed to confess it! And then remind yourself that it is not the future or what has passed that afflicts you, but always the present, and the power of this is much diminished if you take it in isolation and call your mind to task if it thinks that it cannot stand up to it when taken on its own.

Often framed as “one vs two-way doo decisions” at Amazon.

Video of Bezos talking about this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxsdOQa_QkM.

IMO it’s a useful decision making strategy at times, mostly to not overthink the easily reversible.

I've found that what is more important than making a good/bad decision, is sticking with the decision I make, with the possibility of mitigation measures, if it turns out to have been a bad decision. Sometimes, I can pre-plan mitigation measures, or I research them quickly, when it becomes clear that I made a mistake.

Jamming on the parking brake, when going 90, down the highway, is a bad idea.

I sometimes miss a turn, or don't plan well enough to be in the correct lane, when I arrive at the intersection.

What I do, is go "D'oh!", continue to the next intersection, then either make a U-turn (if legal), or turn onto a side street, with the intention of recovering my intended direction.

What I often see people in the same situation do, is jam on the accelerator, swerve across six lanes of traffic, and screech into their turn.

That may get them where they are going, but it also has a very real chance of earning them a ticket or a stay in hospital.

My way takes a bit longer, but no ticket, no accident.

Great concept. Culturally, I think we are better at understanding this than ever before.

In the last 15–20 years, many people have been forced into an uncomfortable moment due to job loss (Great Recession, COVID, AI etc). They have learned to recover. Could this be why we see more entrepreneurs than ever before now?

I've often thought along similar lines. I've found that indecision is almost always worse than a bad one. Very few choices are so decisive that you can't course-correct later.

That mindset has served me well both personally and professionally.

Timing is everything. A bad haircut decision right before the most important job interview of your life might not be recoverable.

Great Clips or Weldon Barber, are you feeling lucky?

https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/402425.Steve_Blank#:...

I actually like hats, haircuts, and tattoos. Seldom we have irrecoverable decisions--except death. https://jamesclear.com/quotes/i-think-about-decisions-in-thr...

(Also works well with LLMs, for risk assessments)

For some reason before reading I thought this was going to be an AI thought leadership piece but it's even better than I expected.

I always liked: is it like shaving, getting a haircut, or getting a tatoo?

The main difference being the time it takes to recover/reverse the decision.

Second point is: You don't need to reverse the decision you took, instead you may find a way to fix the impact but not the root-cause.

It's like when one fucks up the MySQL replication and the data consistency is corrupted. One can manually (and slowly) fix the inconsistency with downtime. Or, spin up a whole new cluster from an existing well-known node/state. Some entities may be missing, but you could gradually add them back later.

Not a reversible, but recoverable decision.

Amazon goes by with one-way vs two-way door decisions internally. Sometimes adding much bureaucracy to the equation. Just-do-it/Bias-for-action aspect usually don't go as far as the recovery period prolongs.