I’m someone who’d like to deploy a lot more workers than I want to manage.

Put another way, I’m on the capital side of the conversation.

The good news for labor that has experience and creativity is that it just started costing 1/100,000 what it used to to get on that side of the equation.

▲

jimmymcgee73 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

If LLMs truly cause widespread replacement of labor, you’re screwed just as much as anyone else. If we hit say 40% unemployment do you think people will care you own your home or not? Do you think people will care you have currency or not? The best case outcome will be universal income and a pseudo utopia where everyone does ok. The “bad” scenario is widespread war.

I am one of the “haves” and am not looking forward to the instability this may bring. Literally no one should.

	▲	blibble 3 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> I am one of the “haves” and am not looking forward to the instability this may bring. Literally no one should. these people always forget capitalism is permitted to exist by consent of the people if there's 40% unemployment it won't continue to exist, regardless of what the TV/tiktok/chatgpt says
	▲	dakolli 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Well he also thinks $10.00 in LLM tokens is equivalent to a $1mm labor budget. These are the same people who were grifting during the NFTs days, claiming they were the future of art.

▲

dakolli 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

lmao, you are an idealistic moron. If llms can replace labor at 1/100k of the cost (lmfao) why are you looking to "deploy" more workers? So are you trying to say if I have $100.00 in tokens I have the equivalent of $10mm in labor potential.... What kind of statement is this?

This is truly the dumbest statement I've ever seen on this site for too many reasons to list.

You people sound like NFT people in 2021 telling people that they're creating and redefining art.

Oh look peter@capital6.com is a "web3" guy. Its all the same grifters from the NFT days behaving the same way.