The next sentence under the headline is "Tech company denied illegally recording and circulating private conversations to send phone users targeted ads".

▲

caminante 6 hours ago | parent [-]

That's a worthless indicator of objective innocence.

It's a private, civil case that settled. To not deny wrongdoing (even if guilty) would be insanely rare.

▲

romanows 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Obviously. The point is that settling a lawsuit in this way is also a worthless indicator of wrongdoing.

	▲	caminante 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> settling a lawsuit in this way is also a worthless indicator of wrongdoing Only if you use a very narrow criteria that a verdict was reached. However, that's impractical as 95% of civil cases resolve without a trial verdict. Compare this to someone who got the case dismissed 6 years ago and didn't pay out tens of millions of real dollars to settle. It's not a verdict, but it's dishonest to say the plaintiff's case had zero merit of wrongdoing based on the settlement and survival of the plaintiff's case.