| ▲ | xnx 4 hours ago |
| Truly. I don't understand why Tesla fans think camera/lidar fusion is unsolvable but camera/camera fusion is a non-issue. |
|
| ▲ | hamdingers 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Because they bought a Tesla with only cameras on it. Admitting this would be admitting their Tesla will never be self driving. |
| |
| ▲ | baggachipz 8 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | I bought mine with cameras and a radar, which they then deprecated and left an unused. Even though autopilot was better when it had radar. Then I realized that this thing would never be self-driving and that its CEO was throwing nazi salutes. Cut my losses and got rid of it. Gotta admit defeat sometimes. | |
| ▲ | xnx an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Add a tow hitch to Waymos and any car can be autonomous! |
|
|
| ▲ | wat10000 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Do Tesla fans think that? I've seen plenty of Tesla fans say that lidar is unnecessary (which I tend to agree with), but never that lidar is actively detrimental as Musk says there. |
|
| ▲ | SoftTalker 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I mean, humans have only their eyes. And most of them intentionally distract themselves while driving by listening to music, podcasts, playing with their phones, or eating. |
| |
| ▲ | nrclark an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | I get your point about camera vs lidar. Humans do have other senses in play while driving though. We have touch/vibration (feeling the road surface texture), hearing, proprioception / acceleration sense, etc. These are all involved for me when I drive a car. | |
| ▲ | catigula 41 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | To be fair, humans are fairly poor drivers and generally can't be trusted to drive millions of miles safely. |
|