|
| ▲ | WillAdams 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Yes, they do, which has had implications for rainfall patterns: https://www.msn.com/en-us/weather/climate-change/china-accid... (if that doesn't come up, search terms to find it were "news china rainfall forest tree planting change") |
| |
| ▲ | culi 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | In fact as much as 50% of the Amazon's rain can be attributed to the trees themselves. Both through evapotranspiration strategies and increased cloud-seeding particles However, I think the more relevant dynamic for this region is the water-holding capacity of the soil. If you get lost in a desert you are more likely to drown than to die of thirst because the water-holding capacity of the "soil" is almost nothing making flash floods likely. But soil that is at an advanced stage of ecological succession will be dominated by mycorrhizal fungi that produce glomalose. This type of soil can hold as much as 50x more water than "dead" soil |
|
|
| ▲ | estimator7292 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Rainforests are tropical largely because of the trees. If you cut them down, it reverts to desert. Geography helps, but it's mostly the plants changing local climate. |
|
| ▲ | triceratops 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| https://www.livescience.com/planet-earth/plants/china-has-pl... was posted in another comment. The tl;dr seems to be less rainfall in the eastern regions and more in Tibet. |
|
| ▲ | qualitylearing 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [dead] |