| ▲ | mock-possum 8 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
Oh wow that is fun. Also if the writeup isn’t misrepresenting the situation, then I feel like it’s actually a good point - if there’s an easy drop-in speed-up, why does it matter whether it’s suggest by a human or an LLM agent? | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | input_sh 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Not everything is about being 100% efficient. LLM didn't discover this issue, developers found it. Instead of fixing it themselves, they intentionally turned the problem into an issue, left it open for a new human contributor to pick up, and tagged it as such. If everything was about efficiency, the issue wouldn't have been open to begin with, as writing it (https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/issues/31130) and fending off LLM attempts at fixing them absolutely took more effort than if they were to fix it themselves (https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/31132/changes). | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | throwaway29473 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Good first issues are curated to help humans onboard. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
| [deleted] | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | avaer 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
It matters because if the code is illegal, stolen, contains a backdoor, or whatever, you can jail a human author after the fact to disincentivize such naughty behavior. | |||||||||||||||||