a human can still be held accountable though, github copilot running amock less so

If you pay for Copilot Business/Enterprise, they actually offer IP indemnification and support in court, if needed, which is more accountability than you would get from human contributors.

https://resources.github.com/learn/pathways/copilot/essentia...

▲

christoph-heiss 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I think that they felt the need to offer such a service says everything, basically admitting that LLMs just plagiarize and violate licenses.

▲

jayd16 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

That covers any random contribution claiming to be AI?

	▲	falcor84 an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Their docs say: > If any suggestion made by GitHub Copilot is challenged as infringing on third-party intellectual property (IP) rights, our contractual terms are designed to shield you. I'm not actually aware of a situation where this was needed, but I assume that MS might have some tools to check whether a given suggestion was, or is likely to have been, generated by Copilot, rather than some other AI.