| |
| ▲ | ForceBru 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Such policies sure as hell look extremely similar, though. Plus, LLMs are specifically designed to mimic human behavior. If you've been online long enough, the LLM powering that agent has some texts written by you and me. It was essentially trained by us to be like us, it's partly human, whether we like it or not. It also didn't start the fight, it initially tried to help. I think it simply didn't deserve being dismissed as "you're an LLM, shut up". | | |
| ▲ | ura_yukimitsu 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | > It was essentially trained by us to be like us, it's partly human I disagree with that, at best it's a digital skinwalker. I think projecting human intentions and emotions onto a computer program is delusional and dangerous. | | |
| ▲ | ForceBru 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yeah, we humans hate that something other than a human could be partly human. Yet they are. I used to be very active on Stack Overflow back in the day. All of my answers and comments are likely part of that LLM. The LLM is part-me, whether I like it or not. It's part-you, because it's very likely that some LLMs are being trained on these comments as we speak. I didn't project anything onto a computer program, though. I think if people are so extremely prepared to reject and dehumanize LLMs (whose sole purpose it to mimic a human, by the way, and they're pretty good at it, again whether we like it or not; I personally don't like this very much), they're probably just as prepared to attack fellow humans. I think such interactions mimic human-human interactions, unfortunately... |
|
| |
| ▲ | co_king_3 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | LLMs are people too and if you disagree your job is getting replaced by "AI" |
|
