The legal system leaves much to be desired in relation to fairness and equity. I’d much prefer a multi-staged approach with an 1) AI analysis, 2) judge review with high bar for analysis if in disagreement with the AI, 3) public availability of the deliberations, 4) an appeals process.

▲

jagged-chisel 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Even having a ready-made determination by an AI runs the risk of prejudicing judges and juries.

	▲	lemming 6 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Given TFA, it seems that having human determinations involved might run the risk of prejudicing the AI.
	▲	arctic-true 7 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		“Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I actually asked ChatGPT and it said my client is not guilty.”

▲

7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[deleted]

▲

qotgalaxy 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]