| ▲ | thomassmith65 3 hours ago | |
I take the original comment to imply exactly that, since it positions someone taking issue with any direct vote as being against Democracy wholesale. If I missed something, @terminalshort can reply to clarify.
There are two issues:1) What are a good set of rules for the system. 2) If the existing system can no longer self-correct, how can one implement a good set of rules. 'Direct vote' might address the second issue. It's not the only way, but it's better than a violent revolution. I'm not opposed to all direct voting, but it does have inherent problems. The most obvious is that the world is far too complicated for a majority of citizens to research all the issues that affect them. In a well-functioning representative democracy, a politician would have the resources and time to understand the issues. Granted, that seldom is the case in reality. | ||