the cat-and-mouse game of digital age verification is such a massive compliance headache. if these guards are this easy to bypass the platforms are basically just checking a box to satisfy regulators while leaving the actual liability wide open. it’s hard to underwrite trust when the verification layer is this brittle.

▲

consumer451 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

There is a way to do this, where nearly everyone is fine.[0]

However, the orgs don’t get to capture verified adult user identity to pad the value of their user data profiles…

[0] https://blog.google/company-news/inside-google/around-the-gl...

▲

brian-armstrong 8 hours ago | parent [-]

It seems unlikely that "is user adult" is not already easily modeled by any of these companies to within a very high degree of confidence. Even 15 or 20 years ago Google search could bracket your age pretty effectively. It doesn't seem like this adds metadata that wasn't already there.

	▲	chatmasta 8 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Google prompts me to verify my age on my account I created in 2004. They’re not trying too hard.
	▲	digiown 7 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		If they admit this, they wouldn't be able to advertise to children anymore without breaking many rules.
	▲	Dusseldorf 7 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Except that in the legal sense, "is user adult" flips from false to true overnight, and there isn't an easy way to account for that in any model that doesn't include verified ID. Same reason many liquor stores ID anyone who looks younger than 40.

▲

tentacleuno 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It was never going to be perfect. I suspect the goal with things like these is to add additional friction to the process, to make it much harder for the general population to bypass them.