| ▲ | culi 4 hours ago |
| Lmao did they really say it's null-key encrypted? Unfortunately a very realistic depiction of how many of the brands advertising their security the strongest often have the most ridiculously broken security (flock) |
|
| ▲ | StilesCrisis 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I rewatched recently. That's what he says all right. |
| |
|
| ▲ | rightbyte 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I mean it is technobabble but in some way it is also poetic. |
| |
| ▲ | culi an hour ago | parent [-] | | It's funnier than typical technobabble because they're literally saying its not encrypted. The writers knew what they were doing, I'm sure |
|
|
| ▲ | seg_lol 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| They should have used base64 encryption. |
| |
| ▲ | HiPhish 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | How about ROT13? Ideally applied twice for twice the encryption. | | |
| ▲ | CrazyStat an hour ago | parent [-] | | ROT13 is cheap enough that you can afford to apply it many more times. I use one million iterations to store passwords securely. |
| |
| ▲ | CobrastanJorji 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | There are performance concerns with base64. Hardware-assisted null-key encryption offers security that's a non-strict superset of base64 encryption and with superior performance. |
|
|
| ▲ | reaperducer 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Lmao did they really say it's null-key encrypted? You know movies aren't real life, don't you? |
| |
|
| ▲ | padjo 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| The Nolan Batman movies are absolutely risible in retrospect. It's hard to believe how seriously everyone took them back then. |
| |
| ▲ | pc86 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Not a single person in the world took any of them "seriously." They're blockbuster movies about a comic book. | |
| ▲ | simmerup 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | They’re good entertainment, not a documentary haha |
|
