Apart from eating less beef, every single suggestion in the post your are responding to is about infrastructure and advocacy, not individual habits.

▲

davidw 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

And almost all of them have plenty of other benefits too:

Multifamily housing is generally cheaper in high land cost areas. It helps solve the housing shortage.

More bikes and transit and fewer cars means cleaner air and fewer traffic deaths.

Less fossil fuel usage in general means less pollution.

Cities that use land more efficiently tend to be more walkable, pleasant, and don't gobble up things like farmland or forests outside the city.

Come to think of it, less beef is probably better for your health, too.

▲

hackyhacky 2 hours ago | parent [-]

> less beef is probably better for your health, too.

Won't matter when it's 120 degrees F every day.

▲

HPsquared 2 hours ago | parent [-]

My advice is to install air conditioning, and choose a place to live that will be affected as little as possible. Avoid the Maldives or New Orleans, perhaps choose somewhere a little hilly and cool with good connectivity.

▲

hackyhacky an hour ago | parent [-]

Great suggestions. I will pass your advice on to literally all of humanity.

	▲	HPsquared an hour ago \| parent [-]
		That's what will happen, you might as well get ahead of the rush.

▲

hackyhacky 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> Apart from eating less beef, every single suggestion in the post your are responding to is about infrastructure and advocacy, not individual habits.

Exactly. That's why it's ineffective to evangelize this as individual effort. If you want to live in a multifamily home, they have to be zoned, funded, and built. That requires lobbying the government, moral rectitude.

	▲	davidw 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I did not write 'individual habits' - you did. Things like zoning are not individual choices at all. But they are something that you and a few friends might be able to influence at city hall.