| ▲ | koolba 3 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> The only way Batman remains a "good guy" in the eyes of the audience is by destroying the entire thing once he's done. A key part of that is when he tells Alfred that he did not even trust himself with that level of surveillance and coded it to only grant access to Alfred. Further, Alfred agrees to aid Batman by accessing the data but simultaneously tenders his resignation. I doubt Amazon has anyone like Alfred in charge of this thing. Because if they did, the resignation would already have been submitted. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | foobarian an hour ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
These kinds of resignations are interesting. The character is such a good protagonist, he resigns rather than do Bad Thing. But that pretty much guarantees the boss will hire someone more pliable. Why not instead swallow the pride and do Bad Thing but with some level of moderation? That would surely be a better outcome overall. The argument is that it would destroy the character's honor or whatever. But that is also a kind of sacrifice for the greater good. Maybe a lot of those are in fact happening but just not visible. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | polar 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> Alfred Wasn't it Lucius Fox? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||