| ▲ | jamesbelchamber 14 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
If they think this is good/important then fine but what they've created is a grant programme, not a UBI. Personally I would have thought this money would have been better spent getting people on the margins the stability to retrain into in-demand skilled careers (e.g. single, unskilled parents training as electricians or plumbers). That feels like it would be a more durable, multi-generational benefit. But again, this is just a grant programme. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Jtsummers 14 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> not a UBI Who said it is a UBI that this "rebuttal" even makes sense to appear here? The Irish government isn't calling it a UBI. The article doesn't call it a UBI. Even the FAQ for the program says it is not UBI: >> Why this is not a Universal Basic Income >> It is important to note that that the Basic Income for the Arts Pilot is not a Universal Basic Income. This is a sectoral intervention to support practicing artists and creative arts workers to focus on their creative practice. This policy is separate to the Universal Basic income as outlined in the Programme for Government. https://www.gov.ie/en/department-of-culture-communications-a... - C-f for "universal" | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | sollewitt 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Society needs art. Artists produce art. There a pantheon of greats that had no commercial success in their lives but moved our culture, we’d be so much more culturally impoverished if we’d insisted they become shit plumbers. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | deadbabe 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
It is not a grant. It is UBI. People who advocated for UBI always said they will spend time creating art, etc. if they didn’t have to work for income. So here it is, the dream come true. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||