| ▲ | collingreen 4 hours ago |
| The obvious pulling ahead from early AI adopters/forcers will happen any moment now... any moment |
|
| ▲ | Rover222 4 hours ago | parent [-] |
| It's not obvious because the multiplier effect of AI is being used to reduce head count more than to drastically increase net output of a team. Which yeah is scary, but my point is if you don't see any multiplier effect from using that latest AI tools, you are either doing a bad job of using them (or don't have the budget, can't blame anyone for that), or are maybe in some obscure niche coding world? |
| |
| ▲ | emp17344 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | >the multiplier effect of AI is being used to reduce head count more than to drastically increase net output of a team This simply isn’t how economics works. There is always additional demand, especially in the software space. Every other productivity-boosting technology has resulted in an increase in jobs, not a decrease. | | |
| ▲ | Rover222 13 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Well that's certainly and obviously how it's working at the moment in the software industry. We're in the transition between traditional coding jobs and agentic managers (or something like that) |
|
|