| ▲ | Forgeties79 6 hours ago | |||||||
That isn’t remotely comparable. You’re asking someone to quietly alter someone else’s product, not selling the product to them. They didn’t pay him to change the extension, they bought it. | ||||||||
| ▲ | ptx 5 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
They bought the permission to make changes to customer machines that had been granted to the seller by the customer. If it's just a sale of the source code, there's no problem. But what is bought is usually the pre-existing update channel (the installed base), precisely to be able to alter the product for existing users without explicitly informing them or asking for consent. | ||||||||
| ||||||||