| ▲ | 7bit 7 hours ago | |||||||
The very fact that UTF-8 itself discouraged from using the BOM is just so alien to me. I understand they want it to be the last encoding and therefore not in need of a explicit indicator, but as it currently IS NOT the only encoding that is used, it makes is just so difficult to understand if I'm reading any of the weird ASCII derivatives or actual Unicode. It's maddening and it's frustrating. The US doesn't have any of these issues, but in Europe, that's a complete mess! | ||||||||
| ▲ | dspillett 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
> The US doesn't have any of these issues I think you mean “the US chooses to completely ignore these issues and gets away with it because they defined the basic standard that is used, ASCII, way-back-when, and didn't foresee it becoming an international thing so didn't think about anyone else” :) | ||||||||
| ▲ | capitainenemo 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
From wikipedia...
That last one is a weaker point but it is true that with CSV a BOM is more likely to do harm, than good. | ||||||||
| ▲ | g-b-r 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Indeed, I've been using the BOM in all my text files for maybe decades now, those who wrote the recommendation are clearly from an English country | ||||||||
| ||||||||