Maybe there's credible threat of MANPADs from the cartels? Wouldn't be the first time around, apparently.

https://old.reddit.com/r/aviation/comments/1r1s4zt/faa_groun...

Stopping life flights though? The supposed risk of cartels shooting down a helicopter vs the immediate risk of "this guy is going to die if we don't fly him to the nearest trauma center"... That risk calculus doesn't make sense.

▲

gsk22 7 hours ago | parent [-]

To be fair, risk calculus does not appear to be this administration's strong suit.

▲

Errrrik 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Lets just for a second pretend that cartel g2a attacks are the legitimate threat. You now have a decision in regards to sparing lives: 1 Life, ground the medivacs, vs 3-4 Lives and letting them fly. Risk the life of 1 person by not allowing them fly, vs risking more lives by Allowing them to fly. (I had to explain it again so that you hopefully understand)

Seems like they understand risk calculus more than you.

	▲	mikkupikku 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		You forgot to weigh the relative likelihood of somebody needing a life flight to survive vs the likelihood of that flight being shot down. The first is very high, or they'd not have called for a helicopter, while the second is quite low even if there is a cartel psycho running around with MANPADS. They're more likely to hold their missile in reserve than to randomly fire it off at some helicopter out of the blue.