| ▲ | rngfnby 18 hours ago | |
So true. How this guy captures the imagination of the English speaking world is astonishing. Sommerfeld Landau Schwinger They mop the floor with Feynman but no one remembers them. Landau, meanwhile had the most comprehensive set of physics book, Sommerfeld the most accessible deep set of physics books. Meanwhile "the Feynman Lectures" burry important details that will derail a train as soon as you leave the safe space of first order approximations. Feynman's lectures are akin to the "everything is a mass on a spring" meme. Actually, nothing is, and the nobilities are everything. To his credit, though, Feynman never intended his lectures to be more than an intro survey class | ||
| ▲ | rramadass 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
> Sommerfeld Landau Schwinger I am the OP who posted this with an idea of eliciting other notable works on Physics and comparing them to Feynman Lectures. I do not want this to be derailed into talking about the man. While i know of Landau & Lifshitz, i have not read Arnold Sommerfeld's nor Julian Schwinger's works. I sincerely suggest that you post a top-level comment in this thread with your takes on Feynman vs. Other authors works that you mention. This would be of great help to everybody interested in Physics and Science. | ||
| ▲ | ndsipa_pomu 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
I think Feynman's popularity lie with his deep understanding of phenomena and ability to explain them to others - "If you can't explain it to a six-year old, you don't understand it yourself" | ||