| ▲ | baxtr 2 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
I love that you brought this up. Chickens are killed ALL the time. It’s a recurring mass event. If you were a smart chicken you could see that pattern and put it into a formula. In contrast, the end of Humanity would be a singular event. It’s even in the name… And that is fiction / speculation in comparison. It’s not backed by any data. Human survival over 300,000 years by contrast is. I mean it’s fine to dream things up, but let’s be fair and call it what it is. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | throwerxyz a minute ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
What, you weren't alive when the last mass extinction event occurred? Why didn't you communicate or at least write the last handful down or something? Aren't you smarter than a chicken? It's funny that you think we know what happened to humans anymore than a chicken knows what happened to chickens. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | computomatic 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
On the other hand, species go extinct with increasing regularity. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Invictus0 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
298,000 of those years didn't have toilet paper. It was utterly impossible for a single person to "end humanity" even 200 years ago; now, the president can do it in minutes by launching a salvo of nukes. Comparing the present moment to the hunter/gatherer days is preposterous. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||