| ▲ | marifjeren 2 hours ago | |||||||
> I [...] fit a hyperbolic model to each one independently ^ That's your problem right there. Assuming a hyperbolic model would definitely result in some exuberant predictions but that's no reason to think it's correct. The blog post contains no justification for that model (besides well it's a "function that hits infinity"). I can model the growth of my bank account the same way but that doesn't make it so. Unfortunately. | ||||||||
| ▲ | twoodfin an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Indeed. At various points you could have presumably done an identical analysis with journal articles and climate change, string theory, functional programming… terms & reached structurally the same conclusion. The coming Singularity: When human institutions will cease being able to coherently react to monads! | ||||||||
| ▲ | azeirah an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
If I understand the author correctly, he chose the hyperbolic model specifically because the story of "the singularity" _requires_ a function that hits infinity. He's looking for a model that works for the story in the media and runs with it. Your criticism seems to be criticizing the story, not the author's attempt to take it "seriously" | ||||||||
| ||||||||