| ▲ | cstever 2 hours ago |
| It does NOT remain to be seen. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/09/26/accenture-plans-on-exiting-s... Big players are already moving in the direction of "join us or leave us". So if you can't keep up and you aren't developing or "reinventing" something faster with the help of AI, it was nice knowing you. |
|
| ▲ | icedchai an hour ago | parent [-] |
| I didn't say don't use AI at all, I said give it the boilerplate, rote work. Developers can still work on more interesting things. Maybe not all the interesting things. |
| |
| ▲ | cstever an hour ago | parent [-] | | That may be fine ... if it remains your choice. I'm saying companies are outmoding people (programmers, designers, managers, et al) who don't leverage AI to do their job the fastest. If one programmer uses AI to do boilerplate and then codes the interesting bits personally and it takes a week and another does it all with AI (orchestrating agents, etc) and it takes 2 hours and produces the same output (not code but business value), the AI orchestrator/manager will be valued above the former. | | |
| ▲ | icedchai an hour ago | parent [-] | | I get your point, but I think smart people will figure out a balance. That 2 hours of output could take a week to debug and test. | | |
| ▲ | cstever 44 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Yes! I am not advocating for the 2 hours and the "vision" of managers and CEOs. Quite the contrary. But it is the world we live in for now. It's messy and chaotic and many people may (will?) be hurt. I don't like it. But I'm trying to be one of the "smart people". What does that look like? I hope I find out. |
|
|
|