| ▲ | water-drummer 4 hours ago | |
Wait, why should an LLM simply not just write directly to the markdown file instead of going through the extra step of using a cli tool which is basically `echo 'something' >> file.md` but with templates that should really be in a prompt instead of a being in a compiled binary? Did Claude come up with the idea for this as well? Also, I am sure you must already know about Playwright mcp so why this? If your goal isn't to make the cli human-friendly, which is the only advantage clis have over mcps doing the same thing, then why not just use the mcp? It doesn't even handle multiple sessions and has a single global state file––this is slop. | ||
| ▲ | simonw 4 hours ago | parent [-] | |
Because I don't want it to write to the markdown file directly. I want it to tell me the command it runs and I then run that command and write both the command and the output to the file. Otherwise it's just writing a document, not building a demo you can review. As far as I can tell you can't hook MCPs up to Claude Code for web. I originally planned to support separate sessions but decided to leave that out for the initial release. I've opened an issue for that here: https://github.com/simonw/rodney/issues/6 | ||