> 200ms isn't enough time for significant information to be transmitted to a person and for them to process it.

I think the point of the flyer is that, surprisingly, it is.

I think there are two different definitions of "significant information" at play here. I interpreted the GP comment to mean "information about the thing being advertised".

The point of the flyer is that you need to get the person to process one bit of information in the first 200ms: scroll or stay. GP's point is that that has little, if anything, to do with the ostensible purpose of advertising, informing people about a product.