| ▲ | jdlyga 3 hours ago |
| Once you have a kid, it's obvious why even besides the costs involved. There's not much sense of community, particularly in the white middle class. People are very individualistic and distrusting of others. There's a good reason for some of this, but to have a community you need to be a community member. And that means letting people in, trusting others and being trustworthy, and being out for the group instead of just yourself. |
|
| ▲ | scottious 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Every morning I get to my son's school about 10 minutes before the doors open. We arrive by bike and we sit ALONE on the benches near the front door. Meanwhile, the curb is full of extra large SUVs idling with kids just waiting inside the cars. The long line of SUVs extends all through the neighborhood. My son and I are alone because people just won't leave their cars until the doors open. A vast majority of the kids live within one mile of the school. It's just one small anecdote, but I feel like it illustrates an attitude I've seen. |
| |
| ▲ | Aurornis 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > Meanwhile, the curb is full of extra large SUVs idling with kids just waiting inside the cars Anecdotally, when my work schedule was wonky for a while I would do the same with my kids. Those few extra minutes hanging out with them in the morning were something I valued a lot. We got to talk and relax a little bit after the rush of getting ready in the morning. They had all day to spend with their classmates so a few extra minutes in the morning wasn’t going to change much. A suggestion: If you want to make friends with other parents, morning drop off is the worst time to do it because everyone is going from the rush of morning routines and mentally preparing for their jobs. After school is better, but the best is at events and activities away from school hours completely. Our schools have done parent socials that have been great for meeting people. Sports and activities are also a great way to get introduced to other families. It also helps to be the one leading the charge. We’ll do things like go to the museum or other activities and then send invites to 5+ other families. Tell them to invite other families. | | |
| ▲ | scottious an hour ago | parent [-] | | I am friends with a lot of other parents already. I do go out of my way to make friends. I already organize bike trips to the museum and stuff like that. I'm a very social person. What I'm saying is that there are a lot of forces keeping people solitary and anti-social. This is just one of them. I know for a fact that some of these families waiting in their SUVs live a short walk from the school. Yet still they choose to isolate themselves. Sometimes the kids in these cars are literally yelling out the window to my son because they're friends. I don't want him going close to the cars because they've LITERALLY been pumping out pollution for 10-15 minutes (those early spots are very coveted). I have to tell my son to hold his breath when we bike on the empty sidewalk past these idling cars. It all just feels very anti-social and dystopian. Sure, school drop off is just one small aspect of life. But because of drop-off culture, there are certain people who I may NEVER have a chance to interact with. Imagine if those parents instead walked with their kid. Maybe I would make a new friend. Maybe we'd have a nice conversation. Last year there was another woman and her son waiting with me. They walked to school every day. We became friends just through school drop off in the morning. It brought some happiness into my life and made me feel a sense of community. She could have chosen to get in her car and wait in the long line of SUVs like everyone else, but luckily she didn't. By essentially saying "stop caring about school drop off and look for other opportunities" it feels like you're missing my point: building community means showing up in lots of different ways, and consistently. The school drop-off example is just one example of many. A woman who lived on my street since the 80s said that back then nearly everybody walked to school. By switching to a car-based morning drop-off feels to me like we've lost something, even if it's just a small thing | | |
| ▲ | insane_dreamer 44 minutes ago | parent [-] | | > I don't want him going close to the cars because they've LITERALLY been pumping out pollution for 10-15 minutes (those early spots are very coveted). I have to tell my son to hold his breath when we bike on the empty sidewalk past these idling cars. social-interaction problems aside, why are the cars idling? seems like the school/city would have an ordinance prohibiting that |
|
| |
| ▲ | nostrademons 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Anecdotally my experience is dramatically different. Last week I arrived by car right near the beginning of dropoff time. Pulling in right in front of me was the mom of one of my kid's classmates, carpooling with another kid who lives in the same apartment complex. The three of them met up as soon as they got out of the car, and then another one of their friends (who lives across the street from the school and usually walks) joined them from his driveway. They met up with a 5th friend before they crossed the street. Then I walked - well, more like ran - with the 5 of them down the 111 steps that take us from the street level to the schoolyard. When they reached the bottom, they met up with 3 more friends who had just been let out of the drop-off zone in front of the school itself. Said a quick goodbye to my kid, but he wasn't really paying attention, he was already ensconced in his pack of 8. I've gotten there with my kid before drop-off time, walked down the stairs with him, and there's been a pack of about 20-30 kids and 2-3 parents usually milling around before the school gates open. I realize that this is somewhat atypical in 21st-century America, and we specifically chose this community because, well, it actually has a sense of community, but it's not unique. In preschool I'd take my son over to his preschool bestie's house (she lived about 2 cities away), and there'd be a whole pack of kids roaming the neighborhood going over unannounced to each other's houses. | |
| ▲ | mountainb 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | If the medium is the message, the SUV communicates that there is only space for the nuclear family members, speed and comfort is of the essence, and the road is the only acceptable avenue for transportation. The sidewalks are for homeless people, jogging athletes, and eccentrics. | | |
| ▲ | bpt3 an hour ago | parent [-] | | Oh good grief, parents with SUVs aren't that complex, and they are often purchased to carry around their kids' friends as well (negating your first point). People do what works for them within their budget, which often is a larger vehicle when you have kids. If you want to translate that as "speed and comfort is of the essence", then fine. I could say the same about someone with no kids who prefers living in a highly urbanized area because their definition of speed and comfort is different. And virtually no one is thinking "I need to demonstrate my belief that traveling on foot is only for weirdos OR exercising" when purchasing a vehicle, both because not many (to be generous) people think that in an area with sidewalks and because it's just not relevant. | | |
| ▲ | mountainb 8 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | I own two SUVs because they are useful. Can't we be critical of ourselves and some of the consequences of our own choices? | |
| ▲ | scottious 27 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | > they are often purchased to carry around their kids' friends as well but it requires an adult to drive that SUV. Car culture has made it so kids don't have autonomy to move themselves around anymore. When I was 8 I used to be able to walk/bike around the neighborhood to see my friends. Then we moved to car-dependent suburbia and things were so much worse. Having to depend on adults to go places added a lot of friction. The end result is that we'd usually just spend a lot of time inside the house. Just look at the dystopia we live in right now: some parents literally drive a Chevy Tahoe or equivalent SUV to school to drop their kids off. How many school-aged children can you fit into the blindspot of a car like that? Are we at all surprised that parents don't want their kids walking to school alone? I literally have to tell my son to hold his breath as we bike by long lines of SUVs idling right next to a school > People do what works for them within their budget, which often is a larger vehicle when you have kids It's funny that I don't drive and I transport my 3 kids around almost exclusively by bike. Yet people who live in my neighborhood with kids insist that they need an SUV for all trips. (yes, I can afford any car if I wanted one). I even organize bike trips so other parents can bring their kids to events by bike so we don't need to get cars involved. I think we've fooled ourselves into thinking we need cars far more than we actually do. Yes, there are dystopian places that are completely car-dependent and don't even have sidewalks, but even in places that aren't like that people still insist that they need cars for everything. |
|
| |
| ▲ | cgsmith 15 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This is exactly how it was for me and my family when we lived in Wisconsin. We live in Germany now. Everyone walks to school or bikes - there is community. | |
| ▲ | stuaxo 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | A different experience here in London - when we are 10 minutes early there's a big load of kids waiting with their parents, most arrive on foot. | |
| ▲ | el_benhameen 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | On the off chance you’re in the Bay Area, look into Walk N Roll: https://walknrolltoschool.org/ I helped start the chapter at my kids’ school and I’ve been impressed by the enthusiasm given how car-centric the school is (we’ve got the big SUV line, too). Like you, we were usually one of two or sometimes three bike families. Walk N Roll days are now packed with bikes, and the bike population has increased substantially on regular days, too. We’ve met some cool families, and the “goddamned big cars idling, you live three blocks away why don’t you just walk” grumbling in my head has quieted a bit. | |
| ▲ | flufluflufluffy 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | jesus that’s dystopian af |
|
|
| ▲ | supertrope 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The book Bowling Alone by Robert Putnam is about the decline of civil society. Church membership is down. Labor union membership is down. Parents got crushed in the pandemic with school shutdowns, daycare shutdowns, and formula shortages. It takes two incomes to afford a family's lifestyle. Someone has to take care of the kid. Two people have to do the job of three people. |
| |
| ▲ | randusername 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Second this. Maybe also "The Fourth Turning" It is cool to live in a place where everyone questions the roles society might impose on them, but it's too extreme lately. The cost of community is inconvenience. The price of individuality is loneliness. So much of life is brutally inefficient without networks of trust and reciprocity. | | |
| ▲ | foobar_______ 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Agreed. Great summary. Postmodernism and everyone tearing down all systems to their roots is fun... until you have no structure left. |
| |
| ▲ | watwut 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > It takes two incomes to afford a family's lifestyle. Someone has to take care of the kid. Two people have to do the job of three people. Being stay at home parent is one of the most lonely thing you can do. Yes, the parent who works in office and goes bowling with collagues is less lonely. But the one who is spending whole day with a small kid and no one else is much more lonely .They cant go bowling either, because they need to put kids to sleep. So, they have to try much harder to have any social contact. | | |
| ▲ | epistasis 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I wonder if what you describe is a consequence of suburbia. In any sort of proper town, there's quick and easy access to parks where you encounter people on the walk to the park, which gives a great sense of community. When you have to pack up the kids in a car you are isolated from community, except through the negative community of bad driving. The stay at home parents k know are not lonely and go out and engage with other parents and have perhaps a far stronger community than the working parent. | | |
| ▲ | Aurornis 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Suburbia is the easiest place to take the kids and go find things to do on a walk. > The stay at home parents k know are not lonely and go out and engage with other parents and have perhaps a far stronger community than the working parent. Same. As long as you don’t literally stay at home, being a parent with kids is such an easy way to meet more people. | | |
| ▲ | epistasis 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | That is not my experience with California suburbia in any way, it is extremely desolate and lonely compared to any proper town or city I have encountered. But I'm very glad that others are having better experiences! |
|
| |
| ▲ | kdheiwns 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The comment you're responding to is about a decline in social institutions in general. As someone from a tiny town, when I was growing up, stay at home moms were always outside and talking all day. They'd watch over kids together as well. The loneliness aspect of parenthood is a modern invention. | |
| ▲ | hattmall 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Stay at home parenting doesn't literally mean physically staying in the house. There's far more opportunities for socialization for those not burdened by work, kids are portable, they like doing stuff, and there's really not ALL that much to taking care of them. | |
| ▲ | AnishLaddha an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I imagine this is due to the decline of local civic life. When you're a stay at home parent, and you are a part of some voluntary association, a church, PTA-type organizations, and the neighborhood is filled with other stay at home parents that you can organize play dates with (or hang out with while the kids are at school), life is less lonely. | |
| ▲ | triceratops 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > But the one who is spending whole day with a small kid and no one else is much more lonely So...don't do that? Let the parent who works in the office come home and spend time with the kid, and go out for drinks (or hiking or the gym or whatever) with other friends. Do all the chores beforehand during the day, so that the working parent only has kid duty. If both are working, both have chores and kid duty after work. | |
| ▲ | Aurornis 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I had a period of behind effectively a stay at home dad and I disagree with this completely. Being a stay at home parent doesn’t literally mean you have to stay at home. Take the kids and leave the house. Go on adventures. I met so many people randomly during that time. It was vastly more social than sitting in an office or working from home alone. | | |
| ▲ | fullstop 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Did you struggle with dirty looks at the park? I wasn't a SAHP but I'd spend time with my kids at a park nearby and people would give me dirty looks for playing with my kids if my wife wasn't present. | | |
| ▲ | Aurornis 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Never once. The internet convinced me it was going to be a problem, but it literally never happened once. We rotate through parks because the kids love seeing new parks. Nobody has ever given me a dirty look for bringing my kids to the park. It’s a completely normal thing for parents to do. | |
| ▲ | an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
| |
| ▲ | fullstop 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This is why "Moms clubs" are a thing. I get that safe spaces are wanted, especially if the mothers needed to nurse, but dads were unwelcome in the chapter near me. | |
| ▲ | bradlys 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | YMMV. Plenty of groups out there to meet other parents and become friends with. I know several people who had kids and were SAHP and made lots of friends this way. Mind you, as the kids got older everyone moves around so friendships might not always last but it’s very possible. And you have a very obvious thing to bond over - being a parent. I work at faang and have no friends from that. I’m surrounded by thousands of people every day I’m at work. Everyone is there to work - not be social or hangout or be friends. People show up to social events to grab food and take it back to their desk. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | Aurornis 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > There's not much sense of community, particularly in the white middle class. People are very individualistic and distrusting of others. My experience couldn’t possibly be more different. Once we had kids it was like our world opened up to a whole new set of communities and other parents. Most of the other parents we’ve met have been very friendly and helpful, and we’ve tried to do the same for others. |
|
| ▲ | nlavezzo 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This is absolutely not our experience, but we've been intentional about joining communities / activities that involve lots of in-person time together. Church is a huge one (especially joining small groups / service groups), but we also do 4H (they have them in urban areas too!), and my wife started an educational co-op with cool field trips, and we organize neighborhood events like caroling at retirement homes, a pre trick or treating party, and a New Year's party for kids. Community isn't the default that everyone's forced into anymore, but if you are intentional about it, you'll find lots of other people are feeling the same way and are happy to join in. |
| |
|
| ▲ | b0rtb0rt 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| this really depends on where you live. i’m in an extremely safe family oriented suburb, there’s lot of community, kids have freedom to go outside, good friends with lots of neighbors and parents, my social life is busier than it was when i didn’t have kids. |
| |
| ▲ | bombcar 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I'd say (and this is painful for many) that it really depends on who you are and how you act - if you're outgoing, or force yourself to pretend to be, and you talk, and you listen, and you don't immediately judge people (by whatever metric you come up with) - you can build community anywhere Is it easier if you're in a group of tightly-knit people all nearly identical to you? Sure! But it's possible with work anywhere that has any population at all. Social media and the Internet have let us self-select for "friends" who are as close to us as possible, there's ease because of the lack of friction, but that same lack of friction prevents our rough edges from being sanded off. The number of people who could list what they want in a community, and when presented with a community that matches their list, cry that it votes wrong is way too high, just as an example. | | |
| ▲ | tcoff91 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It was a lot easier to get along with people who voted differently when it was about differences in fiscal policy and taxation. It's hard to respect people who support mass racial profiling by unidentified masked secret police. My American friends of mexican descent have to go about every day knowing that they might get harassed or detained for the way they look. In my book white supremacy is outside the bounds of legitimate political opinions that I can look past. | |
| ▲ | b0rtb0rt an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | ironically enough my community is inside of one of those scary red states lol |
| |
| ▲ | pengaru 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > kids have freedom to go outside, good friends with lots of neighbors and parents, my social life is busier than it was when i didn’t have kids Don't have kids myself, but this aspect seems incredibly obvious just reflecting on my childhood in suburbs of Chicago through the 80s-90s. But the causes for what's keeping the kids indoors now instead of literally running the neighborhood are manifold. In the 80s there were far fewer indoor forms of entertainment to occupy the kids without driving mom batshit insane and making a mess of the place. Now the kids have tablets and gaming consoles, the outdoors is such a scary place when it's not full of gangs of children who know all the backyards better than the parents ostensibly owning them. It's all rather depressing and the longer I live the more convinced I am that not adding my own kids to this state of affairs was the right move. |
|
|
| ▲ | yardie an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| We lived in one of those American planned communities shaped like a kidney. Our kid went to primary school just outside the HOA gates. He had been cutting through the bushes of our neighbor to get to school because it was faster than walking the 2.5 miles through the kidney shaped neighborhood. The one day the neighbor yelled at him and chased him all the way home. We started driving him to school after that and eventually left the neighborhood entirely. I think we understatement just how hostile western society is to children these days. It's the small things, like an unwalkable and unbikeable neighborhoods, flights that force you to pay more to sit together, and the endless liability waivers. |
|
| ▲ | WarmWash 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Its not boring being inside anymore. Rewind the clock a few decades and there were a lot more reasons to go outside. |
|
| ▲ | alt227 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| You have hit the nail on the head completely. |
|
| ▲ | webdoodle 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| There is no 'good' reason. It's anti-social media that is driving people apart, and it's not good at all. |
|
| ▲ | spprashant 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Yeah I think the meritocracy pushed by America is at least in part responsible for this. Social validation for being a high-performing employee is much greater, than for being a member of the community. |
| |
| ▲ | bpt3 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | It's not an either/or choice for nearly anybody. There are plenty of volunteers at community events in my area that have prestigious jobs, and the strivers working to maximize opportunities for themselves actually seek these out as another opportunity for accolades and networking. You just need to find people who actually have an interest in their community. You know who those people often are? Parents. I suspect the decline in birth rates, especially in urban areas, amplifies this in both directions. |
|
|
| ▲ | lackerloser 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [dead] |
|
| ▲ | nine_zeros 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I think the fear narrative in America is just completely out of whack. Besides gun shooting and ICE, there are no real threats. The politicians have made it seem like there is a lot of there is so much threat but realistically normal people just exist. Stop filling for fox news and maga hate messaging. |
|
| ▲ | Freedumbs an hour ago | parent | prev [-] |
| How could anyone in the United States responsibly have children? If you lose your job, you and the kid die. Lack of health care makes it impossible to have kids unless you're already set for life. One single event like a car accident, disease, or lightning could mean the end of you and your family. The rich don't need poor people, so they should die. |