| ▲ | embedding-shape 3 hours ago | |
Your comment is saying two very different things? > We don't even need formal regulation to start — just honest internal conversation > They just don't have a professional body that can revoke their license for it. What internal conversations could lead to a professional body that can revoke anyone's license? I'm sorry, but your comment doesn't make much sense. Edit: Dammit, I realize now I think I fell for vibebait, leaving for posterity so others don't fall into the same trap. | ||
| ▲ | ultrarunner 7 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
So much AI statementmaking seems to be structured around "It's not X, it's not Y, it's not Z [emdash] it's A" and "What's important is '[experiential first-person descriptive quote]'". Maybe they overfit on Linked In data. | ||
| ▲ | gamma-interface 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Fair point — I contradicted myself. What I meant is: the first step doesn't require waiting for regulation (just have the conversation). But long-term, some form of professional accountability would help. Those are two different timescales, not alternatives. I wrote it badly. And no, not vibebait — just a poorly structured comment from a guy with a fever typing on his phone. | ||