Rather than linking to a threads post that is a screenshot of the x.com post with little to no commentary, we should be linking to the original x.com post

https://x.com/rauchg/status/2020984434338693622

▲

bstsb 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

or to a nitter instance, where you can actually read responses without signing in:

https://xcancel.com/rauchg/status/2020984434338693622 or https://nitter.net/rauchg/status/2020984434338693622

▲

crote 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Considering that Twitter doesn't show the original post for non-logged-in users, the screenshot on Threads actually provides a better reading experience for most people!

	▲	opello 5 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		It seems like sometimes it does and sometimes it doesn't, and I can only imagine popularity is somehow the reason.
	▲	theultdev 5 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		You're missing a large part of the conversation and context if you don't at least link to the source.
	▲	guywithahat 4 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Only if you already have a threads account. On mobile it makes you sign in

▲

xyst 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

for fucks sakes, don’t link twitter

Use nitter or xcancel

▲

theultdev 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Agreed, was slow to load and I just had to find the source post on X to view the real conversation "thread".

This is the first Threads link I've ever seen here. Is that what Threads mainly is, reposting X screenshots and starting a sidechain conversation?