> I only scan the headlines

Have you scanned any headlines about ICE lately? Maybe do a quick search for news about Minnesota?

(I'm pretty sure that if you'd been putting your pants on in Minnesota, you would not have written this comment.)

assimpleaspossi 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Are you saying legal US citizens are having a tough time in Minnesota with ICE? My cousins and their families aren't. They're too busy leading their own normal, daily lives.

▲

malnourish 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Yes; my neighbors had trouble going to the grocery store. From appearances, you might think they're on vacation from Mexico. They have been here for generations, and one of their family is a high enough ranking member of the military that I won't say more to avoid the risk of doxxing them.

▲

estearum 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Yes, two of them were just killed. Does that qualify as "having a tough time?"

▲

assimpleaspossi 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

And how many people live in Minnesota? What were they doing when they were killed?

▲

estearum 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I don't get your point. What proportion of residents does an event need to negatively impact for you to believe that it's hassling people?

Surely it can't be 100%, right? No event in any major city, even horrific events, actually affect everyone.

▲

assimpleaspossi 4 hours ago | parent [-]

How many illegal aliens were killed in Minnesota?

▲

bleepblap 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

What's the ratio of citizens to non-citizens that's okay? One citizen per every hundred or are you thinking 10-1?

▲

pb7 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Have you considered they could maybe just stop interfering with federal law enforcement and let them do their jobs as they have been doing for decades under all sorts of administrations? You'll be hard pressed to find a tear shed for agitators protecting illegal immigrant criminals with deportation orders.

	▲	estearum 3 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Neither you nor anyone else believes this is how immigration enforcement has been done "for decades under all sorts of administrations." You can make it appear as if you have a better grasp on reality by just acknowledging that this is a much different enforcement mechanism than we've seen in the past, but you think that's okay. Anyway there are now several known cases of people being detained or deported without deportation orders. This is another point that you could at least give the appearance of honesty and grasp on reality by acknowledging.
	▲	bleepblap 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		It's telling you chose to not answer the question and instead chose to introduce a different (straw man) question in response. At least people in the past had the integrity to acknowledge their positions head-on. One of the lamentable things missing today
	▲	wat10000 an hour ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Interfering with federal law enforcement is not punishable by summary execution.

▲

estearum 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Huh? Did you respond to the wrong comment?

▲

bleepblap 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You keep moving the goalposts that much and maybe the patriots can win the Super Bowl.

▲

Hasnep 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

▲

pb7 3 hours ago | parent [-]

There has been no such thing.

▲

wredcoll 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Just curiously, what do you personally get out of lying constantly in this thread?

	▲	deaux 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Dopamine.