I'm not sure why the hims investors ever thought that this was legal

▲ InsideOutSanta 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

They probably didn't, they just took the bet that this was one of the crimes that are currently legal, like crypto scams, environmental crimes, bribery, and tay evasion for the rich.

▲ badrequest 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Some of the most profitable ventures this century have been objectively illegal, but when you know you won't go to prison for violating the law, why would you care to follow it?

▲ pixl97 an hour ago | parent [-]

The process of chlorinating water was first done illegally.

	▲	CGMthrowaway an hour ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Also: `human dissection (grave robbing) translating the Bible into English silk production outside of China (death penalty for exporting worm eggs) rubber production in Asia (seeds smuggled out of Brazil) the Underground Railroad heliocentrism AIDS treatment (see Dallas Buyers Club) Needle exchange programs for IV drug users Ridesharing/airbnb/napster (obvious ones) SF gay marriage licenses (in defiance of CA law)`
	▲	maxbond an hour ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		> The process of chlorinating water was first done illegally. I tried to find a source on this but it doesn't seem to be true? The first chapter of this book describes the history of chlorination: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fd/Chlorina... (which is a source Wikipedia cites) and it doesn't appear to mention anything about illegally chlorinating water. After looking in that book I asked ChatGPT to find a source for the claim, and it reported the claim was false. Chlorination was initially controversial but I can't find anything claiming it was illegal?

▲ kps 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The charitable assumption is that investors weren't aware it was a problem.