| ▲ | sigseg1v 8 hours ago |
| Adding on to this, a common reaction I see to online videos of driving incidents is "why did this person just stop? of course you are going to crash into them. They shouldn't have stopped" and many people agreeing with it. It seems they are blind to the fact that if the following driver was using a safe following distance and speed, they should easily be able to stop, making the incident the fault of the driver following too close, not the one stopping. |
|
| ▲ | duderific 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I haven't checked on this in a long time, but IIRC, the insurance company will always blame the person in back in a rear-end collision, for just this reason. A rear-end collision should always be avoidable. |
| |
| ▲ | SoftTalker 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | Usually but not always. A common insurance scam is to pass a car, cut in just in front of it, then brake hard causing a collision. Dash cams video is a good thing to have to fight this if it happens to you. | | |
| ▲ | hananova an hour ago | parent [-] | | No, even then. If a car cuts in front of you, you have at least a few seconds of time to start making space for them, and once they are in front of you, you should immediately make a safe amount of space between you and them. Yes, in a country where safe driving is not internalized you will inevitable have someone rear-ending you while doing this, but if the options are "accident where you're at fault" and "accident where you're not at fault", pick the latter. | | |
| ▲ | IanCal an hour ago | parent [-] | | I think you’re misunderstanding, the person pulling in front is not giving you seconds to make space - they are deliberately trying to crash into you. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | ip26 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Some degree of road safety depends on predictable behavior. I haven’t seen those videos, but suddenly executing a panic stop on the freeway for no good reason at all increases everyone’s risk, even if the car behind you is following at a safe distance. Obviously the following driver bears the most responsibility, but erratic drivers shouldn’t be held to be morally blameless. |
| |
| ▲ | californical 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | > erratic drivers People don’t usually act erratically for no reason. Maybe they suddenly stop because they see a deer sprinting towards the road off in the distance, and the person behind them didn’t see it. There are tons of reasons that look like they “erratically stop”, which are actually genuine safe behavior that the other may not know about. | | |
| ▲ | tristor 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | People act erratically all of the time on the road because they're on their phones while driving instead of paying attention. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | infecto 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| People also don’t realize that just because you can does not mean the insurance will side with you 100%. |
