| ▲ | ElevenLathe 7 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
The one you linked claims to have "Atomic Time" which usually means syncing by radio from WWV/WWVB. I have several cheap wallclocks like this (though none with a projector) and they are always accurate with no noticeable drift AFAICT. Have you tried that particular one and found its accuracy wanting? I think, in principle at least, there should be less jitter in this method than using NTP over a computer network. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Animats 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Right. WWVB clocks running off the 60KHz pretty much solve the clock problem in the US. All my clocks at home are basic LaCrosse analog clocks. They have the internal sensors needed to tell when each hand is straight up, so they can set themselves without user input. On power up, they step until the hands are straight up, then sync when they get an update. You have to set the time zone with a switch when installing. Only the four US time zones are available. Battery life is 1-2 years, which is pretty good for a device with a radio. There are UK and Japan clocks that work similarly, but use national time sources. There are G-Shock watches which synchronize from multiple sources. While running on solar power. Those keep accurate time with no maintenance. That's an impressive achievement. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | cptskippy 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
With a resolution of one second, I think most people would be hard pressed to distinguish between NTP and WWV/WWVB time keeping devices. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||