I think you're assuming more fidelity than the project is claiming

I'm assuming that when the project says you can see 24 km from a given location, that you can see 24 km from that location. That's not the case. Fundamentally, it doesn't do what it claims to do.

Why allow the user to select any arbitrary location on a map and give an answer when you know the answer is most likely nonsense? You don't need to compute for 2 days to accomplish that; you could just make it up.

▲

crazygringo 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Surely you understand it's based on limited resolution data, and therefore intended to be used at the scale of general topography like mountains and valleys?

That it's not taking into account human construction or distances of tens of meters?

Presumably you can walk a little bit and climb on someone's roof to see the claimed 24.7 km. Assuming a sufficiently clear atmosphere, and that there isn't a tall office building in the way or something.

▲

wat10000 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Why not complain that there's a point inside somebody's basement and you can't see any distance from that? Why not complain that it's wrong any time you close your eyes? Those would be about as sensible.

▲

danielsamuels 7 hours ago | parent [-]

Ironically, the site would probably say you can see 20 km from inside the basement.

	▲	wat10000 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		What's ironic about that? Of course it would. It's working off of large-scale terrain features, not structures. It will also tell you that you can see distant mountains when it's cloudy or you don't have your glasses on.