| ▲ | 4b11b4 a day ago | |
Wait what..? please elaborate or provide any references for further reading! | ||
| ▲ | johnbender a day ago | parent [-] | |
Sure! The first is an attempt to provide a semantics for activity diagrams as constraints on a state machine and thereby allow folks to specify correctness properties for the state machine using a visual language. Existing work on semantics for activity diagrams already exists but doesn’t come with tooling in the way that temporal logic does (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1409.2366) The second is an attempt to fix a long standing problem with state machine specification languages. While many support composition operators (parallel and/or nesting) none of them come with strong theorems about when temporal properties proven about constituent elements will remain valid in the composite. | ||