| ▲ | Joker_vD 2 hours ago | |
Not really, no. Newer versions of standard can (and do, although rarely, I have give it to C standard committee) introduce incompatibilities with earlier versions of standard. E.g. at one point the standard explicitly allowed to #undef "bool", "true", and "false" (and to redefine them later) but IIRC this has been deprecated and removed. In any case: blindly switching what is essentially a typedef-ed int into _Bool has no business working as expected, since _Bool is a rather quirky type. | ||
| ▲ | nomel 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |
I'm using the dictionary definition of expect here, which is compatible with what you're saying. | ||