Remix.run Logo
thelock85 2 hours ago

The presence and operation of drones on one’s personal property appears more corporatist in nature than democratic.

nomel 2 hours ago | parent [-]

the current legal definition of property does not include the air above. it's what allows them, and airplanes, to fly over.

thelock85 an hour ago | parent [-]

The top post is about property damage not flying over. This comment is in response to the idea that drone delivery is a democratically expressed need or want. I think it’s a corporate need advancing capital over labor in the name of convenience. Perhaps people only care about convenience but I’m not sure that makes it democratic.

Also I’m not a property rights lawyer but I’d contest the idea that you don’t even own an inch or a foot or several feet above your property, otherwise it would be impossible to build up. Please share a source on your “current legal definition” either in North Texas municipality where drone crash occurred or otherwise.