The laat comment is a person pretending to be a maintainer of Microsoft. I have a gut feeling that these kind of people will only increase, and we'll have vibe engineers scouring popular repositories to ""contribute"" (note that the suggested fix is vague).

I completely understand why some projects are in whitelist-contributors-only mode. It's becoming a mess.

On the other hand ... I recently had to deal with official Microsoft Support for an Azure service degradation / silent failure.

Their email responses were broadly all like this -- fully drafted by GPT. The only thing i liked about that whole exchange was that GPT was readily willing to concede that all the details and observations I included point to a service degradation and failure on Microsoft side. A purely human mind would not have so readily conceded the point without some hedging or dilly-dallying or keeping some options open to avoid accepting blame.

I wholly agree, the response screams “copied from ChatGPT” to me. “Contributions” like these comments and drive by PRs are a curse on open source and software development in general.

As someone who takes pride in being thorough and detail oriented, I cannot stand when people provide the bare minimum of effort in response. Earlier this week I created a bug report for an internal software project on another team. It was a bizarre behavior, so out of curiosity and a desire to be truly helpful, I spent a couple hours whittling the issue down to a small, reproducible test case. I even had someone on my team run through the reproduction steps to confirm it was reproducible on at least one other environment.

The next day, the PM of the other team responded with a _screenshot of an AI conversation_ saying the issue was on my end for misusing a standard CLI tool. I was offended on so many levels. For one, I wasn’t using the CLI tool in the way it describes, and even if I was it wouldn’t affect the bug. But the bigger problem is that this person thinks a screenshot of an AI conversation is an acceptable response. Is this what talking to semi technical roles is going to be like from now on? I get to argue with an LLM by proxy of another human? Fuck that.

Etiquette on GitHub has completely gone out the window, many issues I look at these days resemble reddit threads more than any serious technical discussion. My inbox is frequently polluted by "bump" comments. This is going to get worse as LLMs lower the bar.

Some were already that and even more, because of other reasons. The Cathedral model, described in "The Cathedral and the Bazaar".

No where in the comment do they assert they are work for Microsoft.

This is a peer-review.

Exactly I have seen these know it all comments on my own repos and also tldraw's issues when adding issues. They add nothing to the conversation, they just paste the conversation into some coding tool and spit out the info.

> I completely understand why some projects are in whitelist-contributors-only mode. It's becoming a mess.

That repo alone has 1.1k open pull requests, madness.

Everyone is a maintainer of Microsoft. Everyone is testing their buggy products, as they leak information like a wire only umbrella. It is sad that more people who use co-pilot know that they are training it at a cost of millions of gallons of fresh drinking water.

It was a mess before, and it will only get worse, but at least I can get some work done 4 times a day.