| ▲ | TZubiri 9 hours ago | |
Not confirmed that it's by Github, phishy domain. | ||
| ▲ | resquawk an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |
It's GitHub, using GitHub Pages for docs, | ||
| ▲ | throwup238 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Why is it phishy? Github.io has been the domain they use for all GH pages for a long time with subdomains mapping to GH usernames. It’s standard practice to separate user generated content from the main domain so that it doesn’t poison SEO. | ||
| ▲ | rendx 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Agreed, but looks like it: https://github.com/github/gh-aw | ||
| ▲ | embedding-shape 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Very weird of them to not use github.com but instead use the domain they otherwise use for non-github/user content. Phishy indeed, and then people/companies go ahead and blame users for not taking care/checking, yet banks and more continuously deploy stuff in a way to train users to disregard those things. | ||
| ▲ | hmokiguess 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
How is it not confirmed? GitHub cannot use their own product? Them using GitHub pages changes something? I don’t get it | ||